Junkie: Don't Worry About Will Smith

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 28 January 2013

A "Breaking Bad" Talk Show?

Posted on 22:43 by mohit
On Friday it was announced that AMC was considering the creation of a new after-show called "Talking Bad," to accompany the final eight episodes of "Breaking Bad" as they air this summer. It would be patterned after the "Talking Dead" show that currently runs with episodes of "The Walking Dead." Initially, I thought this was a nice idea. I haven't been watching "The Walking Dead" for a while, but I'd seen other shows with companion programs, like the "Doctor Who Confidential" production documentary series, which contained supplementary material and behind-the-scenes footage that were often a lot of fun. The BBC also did one for "Merlin" for a while. A similar "Breaking Bad" show sounded a little indulgent, but I thought it could be interesting.

Then I actually went and looked at the format of "Talking Dead," and it became obvious pretty quickly that it wasn't like "Doctor Who Confidential" at all. No, this was more like the companion shows that ran with "The Deadliest Catch" or "Project Runway," which are all about gushing reactions to the episode that we had just seen. These are shows devoted to aggrandizing the main program, extra marketing essentially. Sure, they would offer extra interviews with the creatives, and other content you'd expect to find in the DVD or Blu-Ray sets, but the "talk show" was the main component. In "Talking Dead," this consists of celebrity fans of the show coming in every week to gab with host Chris Hardwick. And because the show is produced by AMC itself, or course nobody gets to say much negative about "The Walking Dead," making it a hell of a lot less useful than even the most amateur "Walking Dead" review podcast.

After-shows have been around for a while now, mostly tied to reality shows like "Teen Mom," though the first one I remember getting any significant push was "Oprah After the Show," which aired on the Oxygen Network for a few years starting back in 2003. There's no mystery why the studios like them. They're extra content that can be produced on the cheap, often using leftover bits of footage and production detritus that would otherwise go to waste. They share the same DNA with reunion specials, recap programs, exit interviews, and other time-fillers. They're also not far off from plain old regular talk shows, where the guests are acknowledged to be making appearances in order to promote a new movie, television show, book, or album. However, tying this kind of talk show after-show to a fiction drama series is a relatively recent thing. Aside from a few series finale specials, I think "The Walking Dead" is the first to do this, and certainly the first to run this kind of show on a regular basis.

These after-shows are proliferating because they feed off the audience's desire for more information and discussion about their favorite programs. Rabid fans will obsess over promotional pictures, plot rumors, and pretty much any other tidbit of new information. There's already a lot of chatter about the imminent return of popular series like "Game of Thrones" and "Mad Men," which recently started another round of publicity. I tend to stay away from these discussions because of concerns about overhype and the ever-present spoiler problem. Not surprisingly, one of the criticisms I've heard about "Talking Dead" is that it can sometimes get carried away teasing about spoilers for upcoming episodes. Some fans like this kind of thing, but I'm not one of them. I prefer sticking to more in-depth analysis and reviews, which I tend to get more out of, but which aren't a good fit for the format constraints of a show like "Talking Dead."

I'm not saying that these kinds of shows can't be done well and that they aren't entertaining. "Talking Dead" wouldn't have lasted more than a season if it weren't both. And it certainly wouldn't be expanding to an hour when "Walking Dead" returns next season. However, as far as I can tell there's just not enough real content being offered that would tempt me to seek out the proposed "Talking Bad," as much as I enjoy "Breaking Bad." The show already has an official "Insider Podcast" that is excellent, often featuring interviews with directors and other crew members. Last season, individual episodes of the show were discussed extensively on the Firewall & Iceberg and Slashfilm podcasts. The AV Club had reams of interviews and articles in addition to regular reviews. Why would I need a fluffy talk show that will spend the majority of its time on the opinions of celebrity fans when I already have access to all of this?

I don't think that "Talking Bad" will have much impact on "Breaking Bad" itself, so it's no skin off my back. However, I do find it disconcerting that AMC is essentially is using the same ratings grabbing gimmick that Bravo, Lifetime and MTV use with their reality programs.

But if it had been "Breaking Bad Confidential" - I would have watched that show.
---
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in dramas, reality, TV | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Well, There Goes the "Community"
    Oh, the studios can be so unkind. Yesterday, about an hour after I posted my final thoughts on the third season of "Community," i...
  • So Mindy Kaling Got Her Own Sitcom
    The pilot of Mindy Kaling's new sitcom "The Mindy Project" popped up in various places last week, so I gave it a look. I'...
  • The Movie Gender Switch Project: The Princess Bride
    YAM Magazine, an online publication about cultural media, came up with this interesting little prompt: The Movie Gender Switch Project . Si...
  • Malick's Latest is a "Wonder"
    Since reviewing "The Tree of Life" last year, I went and hunted down all of the remaining Terrence Malick films that I hadn't ...
  • A Trip to the Past With "Hugo"
    I didn't see "Hugo" in 3D, though many of its proponents have been raving about how well the new Martin Scorsese family film i...
  • The Death of Internet Authorship
    Crediting seems so easy. You quote a few lines from a book, and drop a footnote to provide the name of the author and page numbers. You p...
  • An Update on "They Shoot Pictures"
    Last summer, when I had gotten through about 500 titles from the "They Shoot Pictures Don't They" ("TSPDT") list of ...
  • Turning Down the Volume
    Now this is good timing. On Tuesday, the FCC passed the Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation Act (CALM), which tells broadcasters t...
  • An Appreciation of Peter Greenaway
    I was going to write up one of my usual "favorite film by so-and-so" posts for Peter Greenaway, but this director presents a speci...
  • Adventures in Reddit
    A little over a year ago, I was introduced to the news aggregator site Reddit, and it has slowly but surely become the website that has take...

Categories

  • aaargh (9)
  • aaargh. (1)
  • action (122)
  • animation (52)
  • awardshow (22)
  • batman (3)
  • chuck (1)
  • comedies (100)
  • crime drama (35)
  • crime dramas (20)
  • critics (9)
  • disney (19)
  • documentary (7)
  • dramas (133)
  • fandom (16)
  • fantasy (79)
  • horror (30)
  • kevin smith (1)
  • liveblog (2)
  • marketing (40)
  • movie (5)
  • movies (346)
  • musicals (10)
  • oz (2)
  • reality (9)
  • reviews (118)
  • reviews. (4)
  • romance (32)
  • scifi (68)
  • spider-man (1)
  • starwars (6)
  • superhero (25)
  • trailers (5)
  • TV (175)
  • web (43)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (148)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ▼  January (26)
      • Cartoon Network Hates Me
      • A "Breaking Bad" Talk Show?
      • Will Kimmel Win the Late Night Wars?
      • The Worst Movie Month
      • "The Wire" Year Three
      • Disney Drama at Sundance
      • Digging Into "Zero Dark Thirty"
      • The Foreign Film Name Game
      • Whatever Happened to the Films of 2009?
      • "Silver Linings" Has Some Shine
      • Here Come the Koreans
      • "Cult" and Fandom
      • My Favorite Ingmar Bergman Film
      • 2013 Golden Globes Live Blog! Part 2
      • 2013 Golden Globes Live Blog! Part 1
      • The Top Ten Episodes of "Cowboy Bebop"
      • Behold! The Oscar Nominations!
      • "Frankenweenie," "Paranorman," and "Hotel Transylv...
      • Who Should Direct "Cinderella"?
      • On Historical Accuracy
      • "Django Unchained," Tarantino Indulged
      • Bring on the Movie Musicals!
      • The State of Racebending
      • "The Hobbit," The Overextended Edition
      • My Least Anticipated Films of 2013
      • My Favorite Classic Films I Saw in 2012
  • ►  2012 (309)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ►  October (25)
    • ►  September (25)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2011 (43)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (18)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

mohit
View my complete profile