Junkie: Don't Worry About Will Smith

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 15 October 2012

Filing Off the Serial Numbers

Posted on 18:29 by mohit
Last week there were some eyebrows raised at the announcement that Penguin Press was going to publish a popular fanfiction story, "Loving the Band," written about the UK boy band One Direction, by a sixteen-year-old named Emily Baker. It'll have to go through some revisions first, specifically scrubbing all references to One Direction or its band members, a practice known in fanfiction circles as "filing off the serial numbers." The most famous example of this is, E.L. James' "Fifty Shades of Grey," which started off as "Twilight" fanfiction featuring Edward and Bella. There have been rumors of other deals in the works, so it seems like we have the beginnings of a trend here.

There have been varied reactions to this, some outraged, some despondent, but almost all negative. The biggest complaint has been that these publishers are just chasing after the next popular thing, looking for stories from the biggest, most hyped-up fandoms of the moment in the Young Adult sphere to exploit. They're not interested in promoting real talent, but the writers with the ability to attract a rabid audience of young women. Also, they're not asking the authors to write something new and original, but choosing to publish something that has already attracted attention and been well-received by the target readers, piggy-backing off the success of the source media itself. Would "Fifty Shades of Grey" have taken off if the original fanfiction story, "Master of the Universe," hadn't already been popular with the "Twilight" crowd? Would Penguin be interested in "Loving the Band" if that band wasn't One Direction? Sure they change the names of all the characters before going to press for legal reasons, but there's an understanding with the fans that nothing substantive is different. It's such a blatant cash-grab and such a terribly cynical one. What's really worrisome is how easily publishers could seize on this as a new model to churn out cheap new money-makers.

Many members of the fanfiction community aren't happy either, because the young writers getting all the attention don't write particularly good examples of fanfiction in the first place. Looking over the summary of "Love the Band," it breaks almost all the cardinal rules of good fanfiction. The main character is original, a "Mary Sue" self-insert who becomes the focal point of a love triangle with two members of the band. She exists primarily for wish fulfillment purposes. Being able to "file off the serial numbers" generally means that the author has written something either so generic or so far removed from their chosen fandom, the use of existing characters doesn't actually affect the story. The point of fanfiction is exploring the existing universe in a way that the canon work doesn't allow for. So if you've written a "Doctor Who" fanfiction where you could replace the time-traveling alien adventurer with someone from the cast of "Glee" without having to rework significant amounts of the plot, you're probably doing something wrong.

Then again, I do see a positive side to this. I've remarked before that the first rule of fanfiction is that you don't make money off of fanfiction, but there has been a growing pressure to find some way of monetizing the huge, diverse, fanfiction universe. I think some of the old rules are starting to change. The danger of fanfiction being shut down for copyright violations isn't as great anymore, because it's become more visible and acceptable to the mainstream public over these last few years. Sure, it still gets no respect, but at least it's out in the open and people have a better idea of what it is and who's participating in it. That doesn't mean there isn't still some stigma, since fanfiction is in a legal gray area, there are no quality controls, and a lot of people simply don't understand the idea of writing for fun. However, if fanfiction is seen as a sort of training ground for burgeoning writers, and a potential source of new material to exploit, that gives the publishers a financial incentive to let the community exist on its own terms.

As for more trashy fanfiction being published as legitimate books, well, it honestly doesn't bother me much. I remember a lot of equally poor YA books when I was younger, the sort of trendy, weightless fluff designed to appeal to a certain kind of girl who wouldn't read anything else. Remember "Sweet Valley High"? Or if you liked the kinkier stuff, remember V.C. Andrews? And then of course there are the official tie-in novels written for much of the same media that the fanfiction is written for. Why shouldn't fanfiction share shelf space with the books that would technically be counted as fanfiction if the author hadn't been paid by the license holders?

I should note that there has been a small, but persistent group of "Twilight" fanfiction writers trying to follow in E.L. James' footsteps, self-publishing their "Twilight" fanfiction with the names swapped out, in hopes of attracting similar attention. They've been dismissed as craven opportunists by many in the fanfiction community, and I'm not inclined to disagree, but their emergence is indicative of changing attitudes. Fanfiction and pro-fiction are edging closer together. I can imagine some nightmare scenarios where the lawyers get involved, but if they can figure out how to coexist, it may be to the benefit of both sides.
---
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in fandom, romance | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • My Favorite Tim Burton Film
    Writing about "Edward Scissorhands" for this blog was inevitable, as it was one of the movies that I became briefly, but overwhelm...
  • A Moment of "Zen"
    I've always liked UK actor Rufus Sewell, who has long been typecast as a villain in his film career, despite several excellent turns as ...
  • Oscar Drama Comes Early This Year
    I debated with myself whether I should wait and let the situation cool down a little before adding my two cents about Brett Ratner pulling o...
  • The July Experiment
    Here we are, in July 2012, and with a temporary lull in the entertainment world, before Comic-Con and "The Dark Knight Rises," so ...
  • An Update on "They Shoot Pictures"
    Last summer, when I had gotten through about 500 titles from the "They Shoot Pictures Don't They" ("TSPDT") list of ...
  • Where in Hollywood's History Are We?
    The studios are in trouble. The industry is in trouble. The movie theaters are losing patrons to new technology in droves, having been too...
  • TJE 7/15 – Goon (2011)
    I'm seriously conflicted about "Goon." It's the story of a bouncer named Doug Glatt (Seann William Scott), who gets into ...
  • TJE 7/22 - The Turin Horse (2011)
    We begin with the famous anecdote about Friedrich Nietzche, who one day encountered a horse being beaten by his driver in the street, and in...
  • How Will "Mad Men" End?
    Three weeks into the penultimate season of AMC's "Mad Men," and I've got a serious case of the "what ifs." Thou...
  • Delays, Delays
    One of the reasons it's so frustrating to follow movies sometimes is the sudden changes in scheduling. The character of a season can ch...

Categories

  • aaargh (9)
  • aaargh. (1)
  • action (122)
  • animation (52)
  • awardshow (22)
  • batman (3)
  • chuck (1)
  • comedies (100)
  • crime drama (35)
  • crime dramas (20)
  • critics (9)
  • disney (19)
  • documentary (7)
  • dramas (133)
  • fandom (16)
  • fantasy (79)
  • horror (30)
  • kevin smith (1)
  • liveblog (2)
  • marketing (40)
  • movie (5)
  • movies (346)
  • musicals (10)
  • oz (2)
  • reality (9)
  • reviews (118)
  • reviews. (4)
  • romance (32)
  • scifi (68)
  • spider-man (1)
  • starwars (6)
  • superhero (25)
  • trailers (5)
  • TV (175)
  • web (43)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (148)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (26)
  • ▼  2012 (309)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (25)
    • ▼  October (25)
      • Disney Buys Lucasfilm?!
      • Return to "Mockingbird Lane"
      • Faking it With "Argo"
      • "Alphas" Season Wrap-Up
      • Nearing the End of "They Shoot Pictures"
      • A Big Goodbye For "Madagascar"
      • What Happened to "Alex Cross"?
      • Do I Want To Watch This?
      • A Moment of "Zen"
      • Filling Out the BNAT 14 Application
      • My Favorite Coens Brothers Movie
      • Filing Off the Serial Numbers
      • The MoviePass Math
      • A "50 Shades" Rant
      • "Arrow" Sure is Green
      • The Posts I Didn't Write Today
      • "Louie" Year Two
      • An Excuse to Write About "Star Trek: The Next Gene...
      • And What Didn't Make the 2011 List
      • The Top Ten Films of 2011, Plus One
      • "Doctor Who," Spoiler, Spoiler, the Ponds, Spoiler
      • What's With All the Horror Cartoons?
      • Miss Media Junkie vs. Brit Marling
      • Almost Super "Looper"
      • A Visit to "666 Park Avenue"
    • ►  September (25)
    • ►  August (26)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (25)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (25)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2011 (43)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (18)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

mohit
View my complete profile